Archive for the ‘Google’ Category


YouTube Bigger Than Ever

Screen-Shot-2016-07-12-at-2.14.06-PM-865x410YouTube was founded in February 2005 by Chad Hurley, Steve Chen, and Jawed Karim, who were among the first employees of PayPal. According to Wikipedia “Hurley and Chen developed the idea for YouTube during the early months of 2005, after they had experienced difficulty sharing videos that had been shot at a dinner party at Chen’s apartment in San Francisco.” By July 2006 “the site was receiving 100 million video views per day.” YouTube was sold to Google in November 2006 for $1.65 billion, a deal by today’s standards.

On April 23, 2005, at 8:27 p.m., according to CompsMag, YouTube co-founder Jawed Karim uploaded the very 1st YouTube video titled “Me at the zoo.” The video was shot by Yakov Lapitsky, Karim’s high school buddy.

 

That was Then and This is Now

According to Alexa data, YouTube is now the 2nd most visited website in the world and the 3rd most visited in the US.

According to internal YouTube stats, they now have over a billion users, which is almost one-third of all people on the Internet and every day people watch hundreds of millions of hours on YouTube and generate billions of views daily. The last specific number of video views released by YouTube was 2012 where they said they had 4 billion views per day. YouTube video views are likely much higher at this point where video is now mainstream and YouTube videos are routinely found in online news articles, Facebook, Twitter and other social media and are intensely consumed on mobile devices.

There are 300 hours of video uploaded to YouTube every minute, which is 432,000 hours a day or “approximately 50 years worth of videos.”

YouTube is bigger than any cable network in the US and its growth has been accelerating “up at least 50% year over year for three straight years.” In fact, the number of people watching YouTube per day is up 40% year over year since March 2014. Over 80% of YouTube views are from outside of the US with 88 country versions covering 76 different languages, which includes almost everybody. The time people spend watching YouTube videos is also up, with mobile viewing average sessions now over 40 minutes which is up 50% year over year.

Content producers are also making more money, with partner revenue up 50% year over year for 3 straight years and the number of channels earning $100,000 or more per year also up 50%.

Copyright holders are also earning more YouTube payouts, having paid out $1 billion to rightholders as of 2014 (last data available). YouTube’s in-house content team, YouTube spaces, which is “focused on helping creators make great content through strategic programs and workshops largely administered at the YouTube Space production facilities in Los Angeles, New York, London, Tokyo, Sao Paulo and Berlin” is also going well. “As of March 2015, creators filming in YouTube Spaces have produced over 10,000 videos which have generated over 1 billion views and 70+ million hours of watchtime,” according to a YouTube posting.

“To date, the most watched YouTube video has approximately 2.2 billion views,” Kyle Brigham who is SEM Director at Chicago based Marcel Digital wrote in a 2015 blog post. It is that of Psy’s “Gangnam Style”, the popular hit from 2012. At a distant second is Justin Bieber’s “Baby” at 1.2 billion.”

As of this writing “Gangnam Style” now has over 2,606,130,861 views!



Google “Believes” The Doorway Page Algorithm Update Has Rolled Out

By · April 24, 2015

Last month, Google announced that it’s cracking down on doorway pages with a new ranking adjustment. At the time, the company said this would launch soon, but didn’t give an exact time frame.

It appears that now, the update has already been rolled out. SEOs and webmasters have apparently been largely unable to tell if the the update ever launched, but the subject came up in a Webmaster hangout with Google’s John Mueller, in which he said, “I believe that has rolled out, yea.”

You never really get a firm answer on these things from Mueller. It’s always “I think” or “I believe,” and sometimes that has led to seemingly contradictory statements from Google, but unless we hear otherwise, we’re just going to have to assume that Mueller is right.

Here’s the video (via Search Engine Roundtable):

Barry Schwartz at Search Engine Roundtable, a known forum tracker, says he’s been tracking a “ton of forums” (both whitehat and blackhat), and people are still asking if the update has really launched.

In case you’re wondering what this update means exactly, doorway pages have historically been known as pages created specifically to get in search results for various queries, and then send users to a different page.

This practice has long been against Google’s quality guidelines, but that’s hardly stopped people from trying it. In 2005, Google’s Matt Cutts advised people not to hire an “assclown SEO that makes doorway pages with sneaky redirects,” and that advice still holds up today, apparently more than ever.

Five years ago, Google started sending webmasters messages when Webmaster Tools detected doorway pages on their sites.

“We have a long-standing view that doorway pages that [are] created solely for search engines can harm the quality of the user’s search experience,” says Brian White from Google’s Webspam team. “For example, searchers might get a list of results that all go to the same site. So if a user clicks on one result, doesn’t like it, and then tries the next result in the search results page and is taken to that same site that they didn’t like, that’s a really frustrating experience.”

Google has “freshened” its definition of doorway pages in the Quality Guidelines:

Doorways are sites or pages created to rank highly for specific search queries. They are bad for users because they can lead to multiple similar pages in user search results, where each result ends up taking the user to essentially the same destination. They can also lead users to intermediate pages that are not as useful as the final destination.

Here are some examples of doorways:

Having multiple domain names or pages targeted at specific regions or cities that funnel users to one page

Pages generated to funnel visitors into the actual usable or relevant portion of your site(s)

Substantially similar pages that are closer to search results than a clearly defined, browseable hierarchy.

Remember when Google launched the Panda update, and gave webmasters a list of questionsthey could ask themselves to determine if a page is high quality? Last month, they provided a list of questions to determine if your pages may be seen as doorway pages:

 

  • Is the purpose to optimize for search engines and funnel visitors into the actual usable or relevant portion of your site, or are they an integral part of your site’s user experience?
  • Are the pages intended to rank on generic terms yet the content presented on the page is very specific?
  • Do the pages duplicate useful aggregations of items (locations, products, etc.) that already exist on the site for the purpose of capturing more search traffic?
  • Are these pages made solely for drawing affiliate traffic and sending users along without creating unique value in content or functionality?
  • Do these pages exist as an “island?” Are they difficult or impossible to navigate to from other parts of your site? Are links to such pages from other pages within the site or network of sites created just for search engines?

 

“Over time, we’ve seen sites try to maximize their ‘search footprint’ without adding clear, unique value,” says White. “These doorway campaigns manifest themselves as pages on a site, as a number of domains, or a combination thereof.”

According to White, sites with “large and well-established doorway campaigns” may notice a significant impact from the adjustment.

This update hasn’t received nearly as much as attention as another major Google update thatstarted rolling out this week. Businesses who don’t have mobile-friendly sites are going to start feeling the heat from that one if they haven’t already.



Local Search Marketers: Optimize Your Physical Location For The Virtual World

Very helpful information here for local search marketers…

google-small-local-my-business-ss-1920-800x450

Never before have the real world and the virtual world been more intertwined. Columnist Chris Silver Smith discusses how the developments affect local businesses.

Google is combining Street View images, neural network analysis, and a reverse Turing Test via reCAPTCHA to analyze the exteriors of storefronts.

Welcome to the 21st century, where you may need to perform “optimization” on the real-world exterior of your stores to help ensure the best rankings in Google!

While at SMX Milan last month, colleague Luca Bove, in his presentation on the “Making Sense Of The Local Landscape” session, mentioned how Google potentially employs an algorithm with its local search systems in order to improve maps’ locational quality.

I was struck by how the data was very likely also used in validating business addresses for purposes of eliminating spam as well.

Google’s development of these capabilities is just one part of its data collection about the actual world around us that folds into the local search algorithms.

the_neural_network_by_rajasegar-d2xx3w9-800x450

There are some reasons why these sorts of developments are becoming more important to local businesses and local search marketers.

In the earlier days of the internet, a business tended to assume that anything about them on the internet was placed there by them and thus controlled by them, much as their presence in the yellow pages directories may have been handled in days past.

Of course, as the internet has matured, perhaps most businesses have come to realize that they do not solely control their online presence — numerous online directories, search engines, and other types of sites all compile data about entities and display it in various ways.

In the Web 2.0 world, many of us have learned and continue to learn how our online reputations and presence are something of a gestalt, formed of all the disparate pieces of information that are collected together and served up in multitudinous ways. (Indeed, this evolution resulted in the need for search marketing agencies and the more specialized niche of online reputation management or “ORM.”)

Even considering how the information age has evolved to find, collate and deliver up data about businesses and organizations, I’m not sure there has ever been a time when the physical reality of the world itself has been more intermingled with the virtual world.

More and more, things that happen in the physical world are having a direct effect upon your online presence, and so it’s becoming vital for local businesses to pay more attention to how these elements may affect their presence within local search.

Using Real-World Data To Pinpoint Locations

The location itself is one prime piece of the online presence, as we all realize. It’s sometimes a challenging datum.

As I described in my article from 2008, Top Causes Of Errors In Online Mapping Systems, online mapping systems have often been challenged with translating street addresses into the geocodes and pinpointing the locations on maps (though this situation has been steadily improving for many years).

In the past, there was a large element of estimation involved in mapping. As I described in 2008, there were instances when digital systems knew that an address was on a street, and on a particular side of it, but these systems had to interpolate in placing the addresses — spreading out all addresses equally along one side.

There were also instances when businesses’ addresses were clumped — such as at shopping centers and in tall office buildings.

As you may know, Google and some other systems incorporated building outlines for a great many cities into locational determinations. This sort of data likely helped further in determining actual organization address locations.

In addition, more and more types of street data pours into Google and other mapping systems, which map data sources from a variety of city, state and national government data sources.

Two different methods for pinpointing addresses include “rooftop” and “front door.” Using satellite images and/or building outlines, the centerpoints of buildings could be used, as well as front-door entrances, when computing location geocodes or when calculating driving directions.

Even considering the sophisticated mix of location determinations, there can be a lot of instances when geolocations are incorrectly calculated.

For businesses that like to “touch” their data a lot — either by uploading bulk files of multiple business locations in the case of large chain store companies, or small-to-medium businesses that simply take greater care in updating and customizing their online profiles — Google and other mapping providers will tend to have greater confidence in the geolocations associated.

In many cases, these companies will upload the precise geolocations of their outlets themselves, or they may hand-tweak them, such as with Google’s map pinpoint correction tool in Google Places interface.

But, for the countless businesses that are less “touchy-feely” with their online presence — and, this number remains in the many millions, I believe — mapping providers are less-confident with their generated location pinpoints.

A New Google Patent For Identifying Addresses

This may be one prime reason why Google developed the patent that was granted in July of this year entitled, “System and method of determining building numbers.”

In cases when you have longer facades of buildings with many doors on them, you begin to have a great chance of algorithmically determining door-front locations of addresses if you could have a system that would read the numbers off of the doors and doorframes.

On the face of it, this sort of system seems simple: Google’s mapping vehicles capture the fronts of many buildings, including storefronts, many of which include address numbers affixed to the building fronts.

Once these many image files are associated with geolocations of the street spots where they were captured, it’s a matter of running an OCR system through the images to capture any words, and most especially numbers.

Once you have this dataset, process it against the business/organization addresses in your database and see if the locations are close enough in proximity, or whether you need to adjust and update your business location.

Extracting the numbers from the images is a complex task, but Google research papers indicate it has developed a deep neural network system that can be trained to identify numbers of up to five digits long.

Google has apparently employed this system with a fairly high success rate and is automatically translating the numerals from images.

In practical application, this functionality is quite involved, and still prone to some percentage of errors or numbers that the neural net simply cannot identify. To combat this, Google apparently mixes in a human quality-check, according to its patent:

If an extracted value corresponds with the building number of the address of interest such as being substantially equal to the address of interest, the extracted value and the image portion are displayed to a human operator. The human operator confirms, by looking at the image portion, whether the image portion appears to be a building number that matches the extracted value. If so, the processor stores a value that associates that building number with the street level image.

How Is Google Incorporating Human Input?

Google has already incorporated such a system, perhaps in a couple of ways. First, it has been known for a while that Google has made use of a staff of humans to verify new business information by phoning these new businesses after they submit their listings to Google Places.

It’s quite conceivable that Google could display the scanned image number information to these individuals when they are performing their duties in validating new business listings, using some interface to display the numbers and asking the validators to click “yes” or “no” to determine if the address number images should associate with the physical location of businesses.

I’ve had reason to believe that these individuals were previously viewing Street View images, anyway, in order to help validate the businesses.

In cases where there is a suspect Street View image, such as if the validators don’t see buildings at the location, or if it seems to be of a cemetery or some such thing — then those listings get suspended. These building numbers could be used in the same way.

Indeed, if we look at the images that Google is sometimes delivering through its reCAPTCHA interfaces (a service Google offers for free to webmasters for the purpose of validating submission form content to reduce spam and harvesting of data by automated systems), then we see what are clearly building numbers being offered up in order to obtain the free labor to get back text validating their OCR system translations — use of the reCAPTCHA system is essentially a reverse Turing test. (Though Google has recently announced a change to its reCAPTCHA API, it will still be serving up these real-world images.)

Below are examples of Google’s reCAPTCHA interface and building numbers translated through it, according to Google’s research paper, “Multi-digit Number Recognition from Street View Imagery using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks”:

street-view-numbers-recaptcha-605x600

However, I’ve also seen Google leveraging its free captcha (now “reCAPTCHA”) systems for validating and improving quality on OCR translations of book text, and this is also an area where Google is obtaining human participation to improve address numbers and location associations.

In addition, Google’s reCAPTCHA service page indicates that it is also using these images for the purpose of reading the text on street signs. So, the data is further enhancing local search by verifying the street names and street locations from the Street View images (example below).

reCAPTCHA-street-signs-800x360

Now, Google already held a patent from further back that involved potentially identifying details from Street View images in order to help validate online business information in connection with building exterior information such as business name signs, hours of operation, street numbers and menus.

With the vague name, “System and method for the calibration of a scoring function,” this patent was granted in 2012. (Bill Slawski wrote of these developments back when the patent was granted and joked of posting a robots.txt disallow sign on his home to instruct search engines to not index his home images!)

Google-Street-View-Local-Store-Exterior-Scanning-470x600

I would say that the new patent, and the fact that Google’s reCAPTCHA images are apparently containing street address image numbers and street signs, indicate that it’s highly likely that Google is now coordinating this data in the way that the recent patent describes, and is likely folding this into the data quality of Google Maps/Local Search.

The ongoing development of these ideas indicates that it’s an important and prioritized area of the local team’s development efforts.

How Does This Impact Local Search Marketers?

Knowing that this real-word data is getting folded into Local/Maps and is potentially able to have an effect upon your online presence and local rankings, what should you do?

  • Do Nothing: In most cases, local businesses need to do nothing. Most local businesses probably make an effort to ensure that the exterior of their shops make a good impression upon potential customers, and work to make sure that their signage is all accurate.
  • Inaccurate Signage: If your signage is inaccurate, you need to update it! Various organizations such as the Better Business Bureau may ding you anyway if you are found to be misleading consumers in some way, so accurate representations on the exterior of your business place ought to be kept updated at all times.
  • Business Name Change: Did you acquire a business and change the name, but not update the exterior sign? This sort of thing could now contribute to having outdated listings continuing to exist and rank in local search results, even if you set up a new business listing in Google and flagged the legacy listing for deletion. Or, did you attempt to add a new listing, only to have it go into a “pending” status that never resolves? Your business name is a key element and your exterior signage had better coordinate accurately with your business name in Google Local. Those of us in local search marketing have long harped upon auditing one’s citations online and correcting any that are out of sync, and this activity now extends to your offline, brick-and-mortar location information as well!
  • Building Signage: Is the signage outside of your building confusing? This can happen with a great many strip shopping centers and businesses that are abutting each other in dense metro areas. Does it appear another business is located where yours is? Increase the user-friendliness of your exterior by trying to make it clear which businesses go with which signs.
  • Signage Legibility: For that matter, is your signage easily legible? If your sign was painted up in a kooky font that is virtually illegible, or if your building number was painted on in a funky way by your favorite nephew, re-think it, and perhaps replace it.
  • Hours of Operation Visibility: Are your hours of operation posted in large letters outside your business? If so, you may want to be sure they reflect the same info that you post online in directories and in local search engines. One of the illustrated embodiments shown with the earlier patent showed an hours of operation sign on a shop window — so, this might not be as farfetched as it sounds.
  • Street Sign Visibility: Are the street signs in your area legible? I once spent an hour driving around the streets of a small town in Texas, searching in vain for a special sale — all because the words were completely worn off of all of the street signs! You may see computer technicians on investigative TV shows performing all sorts of cool image-clarifications on digital images, but I really doubt Google has much if any of this sorts of enhancement on their images. So, if your street signs in your area require psychic assistance to read, campaign to your local government to have them fixed and updated ASAP!
  • Mail Store Location: For those companies using a mail store as their business location (a risky proposition for local search marketing), you may need to see if the Street View representation of the location makes it clear that your business couldn’t possibly be in this location. Increasingly, attempting to fool Google Local may work against you, as my fellow columnist Greg Gifford stated a few weeks ago.

I could take this even further to a more obsessive level and mention things like avoiding having your business look like a dump, or having consumer-unfriendly jokes such as your door sign always displaying a “CLOSED” notice (as Bernard Black’s bookshop sign did in the hilarious British sitcom, “Black Books”).

Black-Books-Door-Closed-Sign

(Your hours of operation were already a ranking component, particularly on mobile devices!)

But, these things really ought to go without saying! Give people a good experience when they attempt to find and visit your shop.

The real takeaway of all of this is that local store operators must always keep up their brick-and-mortar location’s real-world presence, in addition to feeding and watering their online presence.

Don’t let your exterior signage get out of whack — your exterior must be maintained both for the sake of your local search rankings as well as for making your business friendly and easily-approachable for the people who would be your customers.

See this article  by 

published on December 4, 2014 at 9:23 am

 



Google Tag Manager Gets New API, Interface, Templates

Google tags gets some great updates…

Google announced the launch a new Tag Manager API as well as a new interface for it, and some more third-party templates. The company expects these to make both marketers and IT teams happy.

“Many large enterprises use Google Tag Manager to streamline and simplify website and mobile app tagging,” says product manager Lukas Bergstrom. “It helps marketers control the end-to-end process of adding website tags, while IT departments save time they can spend on more strategic projects.”

The new Google Tag Manager API lets users customize infrastructure, and makes it easier to manage user access in bulk.

“It’s easy to set permissions for many users at once, or set up your own role-based permissions and let the API give the right level of access to the right people in your organization,” says Bergstrom. “Agencies can use the API to easily manage large tagging setups for their clients: create a master container template, specify variations (such as the domain, or the ad campaign ID) in a Google Sheets doc, and use the API to automatically deploy to multiple containers and keep those containers in sync.”

The interface updates include a simpler default workflow, instant search and autocomplete, and new keyboard shortcuts.

More third-party templates will start appearing in the tag creation flow in the coming weeks.

This article was published on Oct 15th, see the article here..

www.webpronews.com

 



Already Bitching About Facebook’s New Video Ads? Well, Stop.

Facebook’s new video ads are pretty much the most tolerable kind of video ad around, so stop your bitching before it even starts.screen-shot-2013-12-17-at-4_1312173_320x245

You know, unless you want to quit internetting altogether. In that case, you probably have a point – Facebook’s just-announced autoplay video ads are just another reason to scream at your phone. We’re all just walking, talking, farting wallets. I get it. Can’t anything just be free? Grr, I quit.

On the other hand, if you’re planning on continuing to use the internet (and Facebook, naturally) like a normal human being, you should sit back and thank Zeus that Facebook’s video ads are the most non-intrusive, easily avoided ads of their kind that you’ll likely come across.

Before you call me a Facebook apologist, let me just say that I’m not a Facebook apologist. I’m really not. Now, that’s out of the way. What I am is someone who spends a lot of time sitting through ads – and I’m a realist. You’re going to have to deal with ads on Facebook. There wasnever a time – never – when the possibility of a Facebook utopia, one free of all advertising, existed.

And from what I know about Facebook’s upcoming video ad offering I can say, with confidence, that oh man – it could be so much worse. Still, you’ll probably see a lot of this in the coming weeks:
fbfu

 

Ok then. Here are some things that we know about Facebook’s imminent autoplay video ads:

– Yes, they autoplay – the same way your friends’ videos also autoplay in your news feed right now.
– They will appear in your news feed just like any other piece of content with which you’re familiar.
– The will be silent unless you tap/click them and force fullscreen

My point is simply this: How many other major forms of media consumption (for many so vital to your daily life) allow you to simply ignore the advertisements with one quick flick of the thumb?

“If you don’t want to watch the video, you can simply scroll past it,” says Facebook.

Just keep scrolling and all of the content that you want to see awaits you – your friends’ witty statuses and their cute babies. Your redneck uncle’s insane Obama rants and a photo of the cutest goddamned puppy you’ve ever seen – it’s all there and completely unaffected by the autoplay video ad that you so casually ignored with a simple scroll.

Let’s think about other common forms of media consumption – YouTube and live television. Video ads? Of course. Can you skip them? Not immediately – maybe you can after 5 seconds or if you’re working from a DVR’ed program.

With most types of video ads you encounter, the ad itself stands between you and the content you want to see. Want to watch this YouTube video? Here, sit through an ad. Want to watch the second half of that NFL game? Here, sit through 45 thousand ads. “Autoplay” ads, I might add. Many websites employ autoplay video ads that divorce you from the articles for at least 5 seconds or so. The fact that Facebook’s autoplay video ads basically do nothing to separate you from that real content you desire is kind of astounding.

What if Facebook made you watch a video ad before you accessed your feed? Seriously – now that would be reason to grab the pitchforks. Don’t get any ideas, guys.

Here’s another thing: the new ads won’t bleed your data dry.

“On mobile devices, all videos that begin playing as they appear on the screen will have been downloaded in advance when the device was connected to WiFi – meaning this content will not consume data plans, even if you’re not connected to WiFi at the time of playback,” says Facebook.

picfb

Facebook is and will always be free. For that to happen, you’re going to have to deal with some ads. And before you immediately start the ol’ “fuck ‘em, I’m quitting” bit – just know that it’s highly unlikely that Facebook’s new video ads are going to negatively impact your experience at all.

Or, if you really want to, you can just quit – I’m not trying to call your bluff or anything.

 

About Josh Wolford
Josh Wolford is a Writer for WebProNews. He likes beer, Sriracha and movies that make him feel weird afterward. Mostly beer. Follow him on Twitter: @joshgwolfGoogle+: Joshua Wolford StumbleUpon: joshgwolf




Articles

Categories

Connect

Web Hosting Specials

Partners